Search This Blog

Friday, March 4, 2016

Middlesex Court Case #673 (1749-1763) Kearny v. Bonnell

Here is the next installment of the NJ State Archives documents.  This is for another indebtedness case for Samuel Bonnell, although it is unclear whether it is for the senior or junior.  This case started in 1749, so it appears the 1762-1763 action was an attempt by the plaintiff to recover funds beyond that which he recovered in 1749.  It doesn't look like this came to much, as the Sheriff's note indicates they recovered only an additional five pounds the second time around.  At over ninety pounds, this was a much bigger debt than we've seen in the other cases, so maybe this was the most significant cause of the trouble.

John Bunnell  

Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #673 (1749, 1763):  Kearny, Philip v. Bonnell, Samuel
__________________________________________________________________________________
Mid’x Pleas

Philip Kearny } Ca Sa 
v } in Debt
Samuel Bonnell }

Ret to April Term 1749

Prin:  Debt July £49:9:6
With Inter from 18th }
April 1748 Icutite paid }
Costs & pro £2.4.8 }
Debt Inter & Cost £2:12:1

Non Est Invertus Hi
John Deard Sheriff

New Jersey }
Middlesex } fs: George the second by the grace of God of great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith.  To the Sheriff of our County of Middlesex ~ Greeting We Command you Samuel Bonnell yeoman otherwise called Samuel Bonnell of New Windsor in the County of Middlesex and Province of New Jersey yeoman if he Shall be found within your Bailiwick and him Safely keep so that you have his body before the Judges of our County Court for holding of pleas at Perth Amoy in & for our s’d County on the Third Tuesday in April next To Satisfie Philip Kearny as well of a Certain Debt on Ninety Pounds nineteen Shillings Current Money of New Jersey at Eight Shillings the ounce which the s’d Philip in our s’d Court before our s’d Judges at Pert Amboy afores’d in our County afores’d against him recovered as also of the Sum of two pounds four Shillings and Eight Pence proclamation money which the said Philip Kearny in our s’d Court were adjudged for his Damages which he hath Sustained by Occasion of the Detention of that Debt whereof he is Convicted, and have you then & there this writ ~
Witness Robert Hude Esq’r Judge of our s’d Court at Perth Amboy afores’d in our County af’d the Eighteenth Day of January in the Twenty second year of our Reign
P Kearny Skinner D Clk









Middlesex Pleas
Philip Kearny } fi fa 
v } in Debt
Samuel Bonnell } post Sei fa

Returned to January Term 1763
Principal Debt Jersey £45:9:6
W’th Interest from 18th of }
April 1748 until paid }
orrig’l costs proc: £2:4:8 }
costs since and of } }
Sci fat hereof } £3:8:3 }
6:2:11 }
Debt Interest & Costs 7:3:4
Jersey

New Jersey
Middlesex } fs. George the third by the Grace of God of Great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith &c  To the Sheriff of our County of Middlesex  Greeting we Command you that of the Goods and Chattles of Samuel Bonnel yeoman Otherwise Called Samuel Bonnel of new windsor in the County of Middlesex and Province of New Jersey yeoman in our Bailywick you Cause to be made as well a Certain Debt of ninety pounds nineteen Shillings Current money of new Jersey at Eight Shillings the ounce which Philip Kearny in our County Court for holding of pleas befreo the Judges of our said Court at Perth Amboy in our said County aforesaid recovered against him as also of the sum of two pounds four shillings and Eight pence proclamation money which to the said Phillip in our said Court it is considered that the said Philip may have Execution against the said Samuel for the Debt and damages aforesaid by the Default of the said Samuel and have you that money before the Judges of our said Court at Perth Amboy aforesaid in our County aforesaid on the third Tuesday in January next to render unot the said Philip for his Debt and damages aforesaid and have you then and there this writ  Witness James Thompson Esq’r Judge of our said Court at Perth Amboy aforesaid in our County aforesaid the thirteenth day of October in the second year of our Reign
P’ Kearny Attorney Smyth Clk
_________________________________________________________________________________

By virtue of the within writ to me Directed I Cause to be taken Divers Goods and Chattles of the within named Samuel Bonnell to the Value of five Pounds in part of the Debt within mentioned which receiving my hands wa sold for cash of Breyer and which asa ale the Goods & Chattels of the said Samuel Bonnell to be found within my Bailywick &c



Thursday, March 3, 2016

Gray/Rossell/Bonnell connections

Several months ago (or maybe a year ago) both Marjorie and John B raised a question about the Benjamin Gray/Lydia Daniel marriage in 1801 in Mercer Co. KY for which a Wm Bunnell was a bondsman along with Benjamin Gray.  At the time I did not see any connection.  However, pursuing the Gray/Rossell connection with the Bunnells I now do see a connection.  

As I've mentioned in a previous email regarding the Rossells and Grays in NJ, Peter Rossell and both of his brothers were married to three sisters, the daughters of Joseph Gray of Hopewell Township in Hunterdon Co. NJ.  (Hopewell Township adjoined New Windsor Township of Middlesex Co., NJ in those days.)   The three Gray sisters also had a brother, Jonathan Gray, who died in 1754, shortly after his their father's death.  Jonathan was supposed to be co-administrator of his father's estate along with Sarah, his mother. But when both died before settling the estate Thomas Rossell along with Peter Rossell completed the estate administration.

The above Jonathan Gray, brother-in-law of Peter Rossell, had two sons one of whom was a Benjamin Gray.  This Benjamin, a nephew of Peter Rossell, was born in Hunterdon Co. NJ and  moved to Culpeper Co. VA in 1783 and remained there until 1798 when he moved to Mercer Co. KY.  He died there in October, 1801.  He had a son, also named Benjamin, born about 1780 in Culpeper VA.  The latter Benjamin is the one who married Lydia Daniel in July, 1801, in Mercer Co. KY.  At that time his father was apparently seriously ill,  since he died three months later, and was unable to be a bondsman for his son's marriage.  So William Bunnell signed the marriage bond instead.  By 1810 Benjamin and Lydia Gray had moved to Hardin Co. KY.

Charles Cornell is a descendant of the older Benjamin Gray (nephew of Peter Rossell) and has researched the Gray family extensively.  He cites the records of Shawnee Run Baptist Church in Mercer Co. for numerous records involving the Grays.  He also states that the Shawnee Run Baptist Church records show Peter Rossell deceased 19 April 1802.  So the Rossells must have joined their Gray relatives in Mercer Co. sometime before Peter's death.  And, apparently, there were some interactions between the Grays and Bunnells in Mercer Co.

We know that there were considerable interactions between the Peter Rossell and William Bunnell families in VA - but it looks like they even continued into later years in Mercer Co.

Next month I intend to make another research trip in KY and will take a look at the Shawnee Run Baptist Church records while I'm there.

George
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
George,

Absolutely fascinating.  I just looked through the 1810 census for Hardin County and see Benjamin and Lydia Gray on page 5 of 24, with William Bunnell, Jr. on page 21 of 24.  It seems like they moved from Mercer to Hardin County about the same time, but did not settle close to each other. 

By the way, the Hardin County Order Books are online at Ancestry.com.  I had planned to manually work through them after I had finished with the New Jersey State Archives documents.  Earlier, we had postulated that perhaps William Bonnell, Sr. might have moved on to another county rather than passing away in Mercer County between 1805 and 1810.  Hardin County seemed to be a likely location to search for evidence of this. 


John Bunnell
Teammates,

One other piece of information from this last document that may or may not mean anything:

The Writing Obligatory note listed the creditor, Preserve Brown, as being from Northampton Township in Burlington County.  So we know that our Windsor Township Samuel Bonnells must have had a connection here.  In increment 1, I sent the excerpt that showed a Samuel Bonnell and his wife Kitty (presumably Catherine Hughes) receiving an inheritance from the estate of Charles Philpot Hughes, who was a resident of Mount Holly, Northampton Township, Burlington County.  According to this document, Charles Hughes died in 1770, but I think this should be verified, as most of the other activity happened in 1779.  In any case, it seems that the estate was not fully settled until 1783.  Here is another document relating to that case.

John Bunnell  



Comments received from others working on this puzzle:

Preserve Brown was a merchant in what is now South Trenton, Mercer County.  Burlington County used to include that area - but it became part of Mercer County when it was formed.  Mounty Holly is the county seat of Burlington Co. and is down closer to Philadelphia.  It appears that our Samuel Bonnel was indebted to several merchants in and around Trenton - as well as to Richard Carman dating from his time in Woodbridge, probably as a result of failed business attempts.  

I don't think there was any connection between the Samuel Bunnell of Philedelphia and adjacent NJ and our Samuel of Windsor Township, Middlesex County

George.  

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Preserve Brown Estate v. Samuel Bonnell.

Teammates,

Here is another one of the documents that I was able to analyze on the plane last week.  This is a court case for the Preserve Brown Estate v. Samuel Bonnell.  If you remember, indebtedness to the Preserve Brown estate is what eventually led, in 1766, to the complete confiscation of Jacob Wright's goods.  Both of these cases appeared to start at about the same time (~1760 - 1761).  It will take a manual search through the unindexed Middlesex County Court records to see if there was a similar result with the Bonnells just before the Wright/Bonnell exodus.  In this case, it is not clear whether the signature on the Writing Obligatory is that of Samuel or the scribe.  I think it was probably the latter.  If the former, however, the "Sam'l Bonnell" construction seems to more closely match the Senior Bonnell on the 1756 document.  What is clear on this document is that you didn't want to get into debt trouble in pre-Revolutionary times.  If the original debt didn't crush you, the court costs sure would.  

I have no issue with anything George said today in response to the increment 3 document.  He is absolutely right that we do not yet have enough information to properly untangle the senior from the junior, although I hope the rest of the documents in my stack will start to shed some light on the issue.

By the way, the document sent earlier today (with Samuel Bonnell as the juror) was from 1764, in case you didn't want to calculate out the "year of the reign" of George III. 

John Bunnell 

Middlesex Court Case #63 (1762-1763): Brown, Preserve (Estate); Brown, Richard; Brown, William; Jones, John (Executor of Preserve Brown) v. Bonell, Samuel

Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #63 (1762-1763):  Brown, Preserve (Estate); Brown, Richard; Brown, William; Jones, John (Executor of Preserve Brown) v. Bonell, Samuel

Middlesex Pleas
Rich. Brown } Case 
William Brown } Debt
& John Jones Ex’rs Ye } £18.12.2
v }
Samuel Bonell }

Cepi Corpus in Curty
Sam’el Throckmorton
Special Bail Given Shf

Middlesex Js. George the Third by the Grace of God of Great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith.  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex, Greeting we command you that you Take Samuel Bonell Other wise Called Samuel Bonell of Winsor in the County of Middlesex in New jersey if within your Bailwick he may be found & himself safely keep so that you may have his Body before our Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in & for our said County of Middlesex on the Third Tuesday in July Next.  To answer Richard Brown, William Brown, and John Jones Executors of the Last will and Testament of Preserve Brown deceased of a Plea That he Render unto them the Sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence which from them he unjustly Detains & As tis Said  / And have you then & there this writt 
Witness James Thornson --- Esq Judge of our said Court at Perth Amboy Afors’d in the County Afors’d the twenty first Day of Aprill in the Second Year of our Reign
Pidgeon Atty Smyth Clk



Middlesex Pleas
Rich’d Brown } Ca. Sa. 
Will. Brown } gr Debt
& John Jones Ex’rs }
v }
Samuel Bonell }

1760 8th April Bill for £9.6.1
payable y’r Jan 7 1761
To the Interest from y’r Jan 7
his paid
To the Costs Fand ----------£
Cepi Corpus in Curty
Sam’el Throckmorton
Special Bail Given Shf
Milage 5/4

Middlesex Js. George the Third by the Grace of God of Great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith.  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex, Greeting we command you that you Take Samuel Bonell Otherwise Called Samuel Bonell of Winsor in the County of Middlesex in New jersey if Within your Bailwick he may be found & him safely keep so that you may have his Body Before our Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas To be Held at Perth Amboy in & for our said County of Middlesex on the Third Tuesday in January Next To Satisfie Richard Brown, William Brown, and John Jones Ex’rs of The Last Will & Testament of Presserve Brown deceas’d as well of the sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence Which The said Richard William & John in our said Court Before our said Judges at Perth Amboy in the County of Middlesex Against him Hath Recovered of Debt as Also five pounds three shillings and seven pence ----------------
Proclamation money Which To The said Richard Willand & John in our said Court Before our said Judges At Perth Amboy afores’d In The said County of Middlesex were Adjudged for his Damages which he Hath sustained as Well by Occasion of Detaining of that Debt as for his Costs & Cahrges by him About his Suit in That Behalf Expended Whereof The said Samuel was Convicted As To us appears of Record and have You Then & There This Writt Witness James Thornson --- Esq. Judge of our said Court at Perth Amboy Afors’d In The County Aforsaid The thirteenth Day of October In the Second Year of our Reign
Pidgeon Atty Smyth Clk


Middlesex Pleas
Richard Brown }
William Brown }
& John Jones Ex’rs } Narr
&d’o } in Debt
v }
Samuel Bonnell }

of July Term 1762
fil’d August 11 1762
Smyth Clk

I acknowledge I have Reciv’d from William Pidgeon Attorney for the above named Plaintiff a copy of the Declaration Filed In the above Cause, with the Usual Rules Thereon Indorsed as Witness my hand This eleventh Day of August 1762 
Sam’el Throckmorton Shf

Middlesex Inferior Court }  of July Term In The year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred
of Common Pleas } and Sixty Two

Middlesex Js.  Samuel Bonnell Otherwise Called Samuel Bonnell of Winsor in the County of Middlesex in New Jersey was Summoned To answer Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones Executors of The Last Will & Testament of Preserve Brown Deceased of a Plea That he Render unto Them The Sum of eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence which from Them He unjustly Detains &c’a And Whereupon The said Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones by William Pidgeon Their Attorney Complains That Whereas the said Samuel Bonnell The Eighth Day of Aprill in the Year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred & Sixty At Perth Amboy in the County of Middlesex and within the Jurisdiction of This Court by his Certain Writing obligatory Did Acknowledge Himself To be held & Firmly Bound unto The said Preserve Brown /in his Life Time/ in the aforesaid sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Schillings & Two Pence money aforesaid To be Paid To The Said Preserve or To his Executors when he The said Samuel Should be Thereunto Afterwards Required  Nevertheless The aforesaid Samuel / Altho often Required or aforesaid  Samuel Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence To him the said Preserve Brown / in his Life Time / or To Them The said Richard William and John since the Death of him The said Preserve or to Either of Them Hath Not Paid But The Same To The said Preserve / in his Life Time / or To Them the said Richard, William & John as yet to Pay Still Doth Refuse and Unjustly Detain &c’a & bring hereunto Court the Writing obligatory afores’d which the Debt aford’s in the fonner forns Witnesseth whose Date is The Same Day and year abovesaid
Pidgeon Quer } Plegii &c’o
Defend. in Custody  }
Middlesex Js. Rochard Brown William Brown & John Jones Executors of The Last Will and Testament of Preserve Brown Deceased Puts in Their Place William Pidgeon Their Attorney Against Samuel Bonnell otherwise called &c’a in a Plea of Debt &c’a

Know all men by These Preents That I Samuel Bonell of winsor in the County of Middlesex in New Jersey am holden & Firmly Bound unto Presserve Brown of Nottingham in the County of Burlington in The Sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence To be Paid To The daid Presserve Brown or To his Certain Attorney Hiers Adm’trs or assigns Thowhich Payment well & Truly To be made I do hereby Bind my self my heirs Ex’rs and Adm’trs firmly by These Presents sealed with my seal & Dated This Eighth Day of Aprill in The year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred & Sixty
The Condition of This obligation is Such That if The above Bounden Samuel Bonell or his Heirs Ex’rs or Adm’trs do well & Truly Pay or Cause to be Paid unto The above said Preserve Brown or To his Certain Attorney Heirs Ex’rs Adm’trs or assigns The Sum of Nine Pounds Six Shillings & of Like Current money as abovesaid and That at or Before The first Day of Janueary next Insuing The Date hereof withour fraud or any farther Delay

Sealed & delivered } Sam’l Bonnel [Sealed]




In the Presence of }


Middlesex Pleas
Richard Brown }
William Brown & } Judgment
John Jones Ex’rs of } Roll
Presserve Brown }
Deceased }

fil’d Novbr 22 1762
Smyth Clk
Pleas Before John Anderson Esq. and his Brethren Judges of the Inferior Court of Common Please Held at Perth Amboy in & for The County of Middlesex of The Term of October in The Year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred & Sixty Two.
Smith
Middlesex Js. Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones Ex’rs of The Last will and Testament of Preserve Brown Deceas’d Puts in Their Place William Pidgeon their Attorney Against Samuel Bonell Otherwise Called Yc’a in a Plea of Debt

Middlesex Js. Samuel Bonell otherwise Called Samuel Bonell of winsor in The County of Middlesex in New Jersey was Summoned To answer Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones Ex’rs of The Last Will & Testament of Preserve Brown Deceas’s of a Plea That he Render unto them the Sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings and Two Pence Which from Him he unjustly Detains Yc’a And Whereupon the said Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones by William Pidgeon Their Attorney Complains That Whereas The said Samuel Bonell The Eighth Day of Aprill in the year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred & Sixty at Perth Amboy in The County of Middlesex and Within the Jurisdiction of This Court by his Certain Writing obligatory Did acknowledge himself To be Held & Firmly Bound Unto The said Preserve Brown in his Lifetime in The aforesaid sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence money aforesaid To be Paid To The said Preserve or his Executors When he the said Samuel should be Thereunto afterward Required Nevertheless The Aforesaid Samuel Altho often Required .  The Aforesaid Sum of Eighteen Pounds Twelve Shillings & Two Pence To him the said Presserve Brown / in his life Time / or To Them The said Richard William & John since The Death of him The s’d Preserve or To Either of Tem Hath Not paid but The same To The said Presserve in his Life time  / or To Them The said Richard William & John since his Death no together Hath Richard / & Tiosnine To Him the s’d Richard William & John To Pay Still Doth Refuse & Unjustly Detains so one Damages The The said Richard William and John Ten Pounds money afores’d.  & Thon of They Bring This Suit and Bring into Court The Writing obligatory Aforesaid Which the Debt Aforesaid in form Afores’d 
Witnesseth Whose Date is The Same Day & year abovesaid ~ and the aforesaid Samuel Bonell / in his Proper Person /  comes & Defends The force & Inquiry When &c’a and Saith Nothing in Bar or Preclusion of the Action of the afors’d Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones by Which the same Richard, William, & John Remaine Against the aforesaid Samuel Without his Defense Thenir Therefore it is Considered That The Aforesaid Richard William and John Do Recover Against The Aforesaid Samuel Their Debt Afors’d & Their Damages by Occasion of Detaining of That Debt, To five pounds three shillings and seven pence ---- Proclamation money adjudged by the Court here To The same Richard Brown William Brown & John Jones on Their assent and The aforesaid Samuel Bonell In Mercy &c’a

Judgement Signed This XXII Day of November 1762
John Nevill


Middlesex Pleas
Ex’rs of Pressence }
Brown Deceas’d }
v }
Sam. Bonell }

To be Tax’d and ret’d


Middlesex Pleas
Rich’d Brown William Brown }
& John Jones Ex’rs of P. Brown } In Debt
Deceas’d } &c’a
v }
Samuel Bonell }

Nac. & July Term 1762 £
Warr. of Att’y Copy & fil. 0.1.9
Retaining fee 0.6.0
Writt seal &c’a 0.4.6
Sherriff 0.10.9
Motion for the Body 0.6.0
Rule Jude Copy & Serv. 0.3.6
Rule to Declare 0.0.6
Rule to Plead Copy &c’a 0.3.6
Judge Cryer & T. fee 0.8.2
Draw. Decl. 0.5.0
Copy & fil. 0.2.11
Copy To Serve on Sherr & Sen. 0.3.11
Copy B’d & fil. 0.1.6
Draw Sher. Ret. 0.1.0
October Term 1762
Read & fil. Sherr. Rec’t 0.1.0
mot. for Judgm’t Int. & T. fee 0.12.6
Ent. Decl. on The Roll 0.3.4
Ent. 1 Warr. on D’o 0.0.9
Ent Judgm’t on D’o 0.5.0
Tax. Cost & Sign Roll 0.3.0
Copy Cost To file 0.1.0
Clk fil. Roll & Copy Cost 0.1.0
Draw Ex. Seal &c 0.3.6
January Term 1762
Other Lt Writt 0.6.6
mot for Com.~ Int. & T. fee 0.13.0
£ 5-3-7

I tax this bill of cost at five pounds three
shillings and seven pence procl’n money

John Neville


More on the Samuel Bonnells of Middlesex County

Teammates,

Here is the next New Jersey State Archives document that I was able to analyze and transcribe on the airplane the other day.  For this document, the Bonnells were on the right side of the law, for a change.  Samuel Bonnell is one of the jurors on this inquiry regarding Josiah Williams.  This case was multiple pages, but I could only find Samuel Bonnell listed on the last one, so that was the only copy I made in my haste.  Probably the most important thing about this document is that the sealed signature is the most likely of all the documents to have been Samuel's actual signature.  On many of the other documents, as George predicted, it is often difficult to tell whether the signature was that of the signatory or that of the scribe.  If we assume the side-by-side signatures on a 1756 document (which you haven't seen yet) are the actual signatures of Samuel Bonnell Sr. and Samuel Bonnell Jr. then the "Sam'el Bonnell" construction is more consistent with the senior Bonnell. Nonetheless, which of the several mid-1760s documents applies to the senior versus junior is still very unclear.  The courts began differentiating between the two as early as 1732, but then stopped doing so after the early 1760s.  The appearance of the adult junior in 1732 would match nicely if the Woodbridge documents demonstrate that a Samuel Junior was born in 1707.  The this would also coincide nicely with the removal from the tax rolls in
Loudon County in 1771, as this often appears to happen around age 65.  

Absent other evidence, the change to the differentiation between a senior and junior Samuel Bonnell might indicate the death of the Senior in the early 1760s.  However, this does not then fit with the fact that we need two Samuel Bonnells alive in 1768-1771 to account for the one in debtors prison in Middlesex County and the one with William in Loudon County.

John Bunnell  

This is one response to John's report:

John, et.al.,

I agree that the signatures at the bottom of the document appear to be actual signatures (complete with thumbprints).  They are not in the same handwriting as the body of the document and, within the document, the names are not written the same, e.g., Samuel Bonnell vs Sam'el Bonnel, Joseph Moore vs. Jos Moore, etc.

I'm not so sure about which Samuel was the one in Loudoun VA in 1771.  64 doesn't seem to me to be old enough to be considered "of great age" even in those days.  While statistical life expectancy was lower because of so many childhood deaths and deaths from accidents, many people lived well into their 80s. Since marriages were sanctioned at rather early ages, Samuel, Sr. might have been in his early 80s in 1771 if married in 1707.   And I don't think someone in their 80s would have been confined to jail for several years as a debtor, even in those days.  We don't have enough information to know for sure one way or the other yet.

I have found a copy of Rev. Joseph W. Dally's 1873 book about Woodbridge on-line at archive.org.  Unfortunately his list of the records is also a transcription of the originals and the one particular record of most interest to us is identical to the one included in my email message on that subject - with the name transcribed as Burrell.

So I think the LDS mf images of the records is the only alternative to actually looking at the original record books.

George


Here's a link to Rev. Dally's book on Archive.org. That site is a real treasure trove.

Middlesex Court Case #1369 (1764) [partial]

Transcription of
Middlesex Js. Inquisition Indented & taken at the dwelling House of William Callendar – Innholder in Perth Amboy in the County af’d the Seventeenth Day of January in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred & Sixty Four, Before James Brooks --- Esq’r high Sheriff of the county af’d -------
By Virtue of a Certain Writ of our Lord the King to the s’d Sheriff directed and to this Inquisition annexed by the Oaths & Affirmations of Nathaniel Hek Randolph, Joseph Moore, Esek Fek Randolph, Benjamin Shotwell, Samuel Bonnell, James Marshall, Ebenezer Foster, Robert Lee, David Jagues, Andrew Bloomfield, Thomas Smith, John Bessenea ------------- who upon their Oath and Affirmations do say that Josiah Wynans Junior in the Writ of Inquiry hereunto annexed names hath sustained Damages by Occassion of the Premises in the s’d Writ mentioned to thirteen Pounds & Nine Shilllings ---------------- Current money of the Province of New Jersey at Eight Shillings the Pence, and for his Costs & Charges by him about his suit in this Behalf expended to Six Pence  - In Testimony whereof as well the s’d Sheriff th Jurors af’d have hereunto set their Hands & Seals the Day and Year first above said ----------------
Ja’s Brooks Shf

Nath’el Hitz Randolph Ebenezer Foster
Jos Moore Robert Lee
Ezk Fritz Randolph David Jarvis
Benjamin Shotwell Andrew Bloomfield
Sam’el Bonnel Tho’s Smith

Ja’s Marshall John Bessonex

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Update on the Windsor Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey Samuel Bonnells

Teammates,

Here is the next installment from the NJ State Archives regarding the
Middlesex County Bonnells.  This is the latest court case we have on the
Windsor Township, NJ Samuel Bonnells before the indexing runs out.  This is
a case that started in 1761 (many of them start this year, both for the
Bonnells and for Jacob Wright), but was coming to a head in 1764.  Like
George has often commented, this document generates as many questions as
answers.  This document does not specify whether it is for Samuel Bonnell,
Jr. or Samuel Bonnell, Sr., unlike many others in my pile. The signature on
the obligatory note looks more like that of the senior, but it is not clear
that this is really his signature instead of the scribe's transcription.
The document lists his profession as an innkeeper, which is different than
earlier documents that list the Bonnells as either blacksmiths or yeomen.
It is interesting that the plaintiffs are merchants from Philadelphia
demanding payment in Pennsylvania script.  Is this a clue that may lead to
the merger of the Middlesex County blacksmith Samuel Bonnell family and the
Gloucester County/Philadelphia blacksmith Samuel
Bonnell family, or is it just an indication that everyone in the area
conducted business in Philadelphia?

Still working....

John Bunnell 

The documents and transcription for Middlesex Court of Common Pleas, Case #1532 1764 - Reed & Pettit v. Samuel Bonnell are in a separate post below.