Search This Blog

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Middlesex Court of Common Pleas, Case #1161 (1759) - Stout, Hezekiah v. Bonnel, Samuel Sr.

I apologize for not posting this sooner. I just found it in the drafts folder.

Teammates,

I am able to copy a second one today, since these have been short.  Moving
back to 1759, here is yet another writ related to an indebtedness case.
This time, the plaintiff is one we have not yet encountered, Hezekiah Stout.
Like the 1760 case, this one specifically identifies Samuel Bonnell, Senior
as the defendant.  Note that the name is spelled three different ways in the
document:  Bonnel, Bunnil and Bunnill.  Although this case appears to have
started in August 1759, it was returned to the January 1760 session of the
court, so it preceded the Preserve Brown case by only a couple of months.
The sheriff annotates the result of the writ as Cepi Corpus in Cust'y, so
this now gives us the cumulate result from all of the writs:

Jacob Wright -     1761 (v. Brown Estate) - Cepi Corpus
        July 1766 (v. Richard Brown) - Non Est

Samuel Bonnell, Sr. -     January 1760 (v. Stout) Cepi Corpus in Cust'y
            April 1760 (v. Brown ) Cepi Corpus in Cust'y
            April 1761 (v. Watson) Cepi Corpus
            April 1762 (v. Brown estate) Cepi Corpus in Cust'y 
            October 1762 (v. Brown estate) Cepi Corpus in Cust'y

Samuel Bonnell, Jr. - 1761 (v. Watson) Non Est

Samuel Bonnell (undefined) -     January 1749 (v. Kearny) Non Est Inventus
                October 1764 (v. Reed & Pettit) - Cepi
Corpus in Custodia     

Diane added:

Some food for thought..... I am a descendant of Kentucky's Susannah Bunnell, supposed daughter of William. I have 3 other 3rd and 4th greatgrandmothers from the Bunnell area in NJ. The names showing up in my autosomal DNA are Sutton,  Doty, Blackford, Hull, Vail, Fitzrandolf, Drake and Dunham. I have seen that a Bonnell and Blackford have married and lived in Ohio. I was also wondering about the William Hall who was associated with the Bonnells. Perhaps it was Hull. Just thought I'd mention these names as they are from the area and if you stumble across them in the research you can take an extra look. Just trying to help! 

__________________________________________________________________________________
Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #1161 (1759): Stout, Hezekiah v. Bunnill, Samuel, Sr. 
Mid’x Common Pleas
Hezekiah Stout } Ca Sa 
V } Indebt
Sam’l Bonnel Sen. }

Returnable to Jan’ry 1760 

Remains unpaid of debt unto and
costs - - - - - - - - - £12.5.0
Int’t from Aug’t 1759

Cepi Corpus in Cust’y  W’m Crawford 
Sheriff


New Jersey }
Middlesex } fs. George the second by the grace of God of Great Brittain France and Ireland King defender of the faith &c  to the sheriff of the county of Middlesex Greeting we Command you that you take Samuel Bunnil otherwise called Samuel Bunnill sen’r of the township of Windsor and county of Middlesex and province of New Jersey if he may be found within your bailwick and him safely keep so that you have his body before the Judges of our inferior court of common pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in and for said county of Middlesex on the third tuesday in January next to satisfy Hezekiah Stout in our said court before the Judges thereof at Perth Amboy aforesaid recovered against him as of five pounds and three pence money aforesaid which to the same Hezekiah Stout in our same court were adjudged for his damages which he hath sustained by occasion of the detention of that same debt whereas he is convicted, and have you then there this writ  Wittness James Hude Esq’r Judge of our said court at Perth Amboy aforesaid the tenth day of October in the thirty third year of our Reign ~

Pidgeon Att’y Smyth Clk



Teammate George Farris wrote " Hezekiah Stout may have been trying to recover  a debt that Samuel Bonnell owed to Samuel Moore.  He was one of the administrators of the estate of Samuel Moore a couple of months later.  Both Stout and Moore lived in Hopewell Township, then part of Hunterdon County.  See attachment."

Middlesex Court Case #59 (1760): Brown, Preserve v. Bonnell, Samuel, Sr.

Teammates,

Continuing to work backward through these documents, here is another writ
involving Preserve Brown and the Windsor Township Bonnells, this one from 1760.  There are
several notable take-aways from this document.

First, this writ and the documents from 1762-7163 case #63 (Brown estate vs.
Samuel Bonnell) appear to all relate to the same case.  I say this because
this document says that Samuel Bonnell is to be present in the April 1760
court.  The latter case includes a bill signed on 8 April 1760 by Samuel
Bonnell, promising to pay a portion of the debt before the end of the year
(which apparently, he was unable to do).

Second, this writ clearly identifies the defendant as Samuel Bonnell,
Senior.  I also assume, therefore, that the 1762-1763 case also involved the
elder Samuel Bonnell, although there is always the chance that the elder
could have died and the executors were now suing the Samuel Bonnell, Junior
as the heir.  I think it more likely that the executors were just pursuing
the case against the original plaintiff in an attempt to settle the Preserve
Brown estate as quickly as possible.

Third, the case appears to have originated in debt, as the outside of the
writ describes, even though the charge is "Tresspass" in the language of the
writ.  Having looked at a variety of these, it seems that trespass is a
catch all for any type of affront.  As we have seen in the past, the action
seems to be to recover proclamation money rather than the principal for the
debt, so this may indicate that there is previous documentation on this
case.

Fourth, this case resulted in a Cepi Copus in Custody, so Samuel Bonnell Sr.
was still standing in defense of himself at this stage.  To add this to our
running list, we now have:

Jacob Wright -     1761 (v. Brown Estate) - Cepi Corpus
        July 1766 (v. Richard Brown) - Non Est

Samuel Bonnell, Sr. -     April 1760 (v. Brown ) Cepi Corpus in Custy
            April 1761 (v. Watson) Cepi Corpus
            April 1762 (v. Brown estate) Cepi Corpus in Custy
            October 1762 (v. Brown estate) Cepi Corpus in Custy

Samuel Bonnell, Jr. - 1761 (v. Watson) Non Est

Samuel Bonnell (undefined) -     January 1749 (v. Kearny) Non Est Inventus
[same definition as Non Est]
                October 1764 (v. Reed & Pettit) - Cepi
Corpus in Custodia

John Bunnell


Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #59 (1760):  Brown, Preserve v. Bonnell, Samuel, Sr. 
__________________________________________________________________________________
Middlesex Common Pleas
Preserve Brown } Cap’e in 
V } Case Dam’s
Sam’l Bonnell Sen’r } £20

Returnable to April term 1760 

Cepi Corpus in Cust
W’m Crawford Sherr

Middlesex fs. George the second by the Grace of God of great Britain France, and Ireland King defender of the faith &c  to our sheriff of our County of Middlesex Greeting we Command you that you take Samuel Bonnell Sen’r (late of the County afores’d) if he may be found in your bailywick and him safely keep so that you may have his body before our Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in and for our County of Middlesex on the third Tuesday in April next then and there to answer Preserve Brown of a Plea of Tresspass upon the case & to his damage twenty Pounds proclamation money /as is said/ and have you then and there this Writt  Wittness James Hude Esq’r Judge of our said Court at Perth Amboy aforesaid the fifteenth day of January in the thirty third year of our Reign ~
Pidgeon Att’y Smyth Clk





Friday, March 4, 2016

Teammates,

For Increment 8, I'll include two documents, which are nearly identical, except for one detail which might be a key piece to untangling this mystery.  Both documents are Middlesex Court writs from 1761, sequential in order, the first calling for the detention of Samuel Bonnell, Junior and the second calling for the detention of Samuel Bonnell, Senior for what is clearly the same debt (31 pounds, 4 shillings to Thomas Watson).  These list their residence as "near Penn's Neck" and again are being prosecuted by attorney Richard Stockton, who was later a signatory to the Declaration of Independence. 

The difference between the two has to do with the Sheriff's notes on the outside of the writ.  

For Samuel Bonnell, Junior, the Sheriff's report is "Non Est,"  which, according to dictionary.com means "the returning of a sheriff's writ when the person to be arrested or served with it cannot be found in the sheriff's jurisdiction."  

For Samuel Bonnell, Senior, on the other hand, the Sheriff's report is "Cepi Corpus" which is defined as "the return which the sheriff, or other proper officer, makes when he has arrested a defendant by virtue of a capias."  Now that I understand this, we can review the cases we have seen so far:

Jacob Wright -     1761 (v. Brown Estate) - Cepi Corpus
        July 1766 (v. Richard Brown) - Non Est

Samuel Bonnell, Sr. - 1761 (v. Watson) Cepi Corpus

Samuel Bonnell, Jr. - 1761 (v. Watson) Non Est

Samuel Bonnell (undefined) -     January 1749 (v. Kearny) Non Est Inventus [same definition as Non Est]
                April 1762 (v. Brown estate) Cepi Corpus in Custy
                October 1762 (v. Brown estate) Cepi Corpus in Custy 
                October 1764 (v. Reed & Pettit) - Cepi Corpus in Custodia

I will continue to populate this list as we add more cases.  In some instances, it is probably just coincidental that the sheriff couldn't find someone (1749, perhaps).  But, it can also give us some theories to guide our search for more data points.  For Jacob Wright, I think his absence in 1766 might indicate he was already on the road to Virginia, potentially with all the possessions he could carry on his back, thus the reason the Sheriff could only sell five pounds worth of goods.  For the Bonnells in 1761, you would think that Samuel, Sr. knew where his son was, but it looks like he took the wrap.  For the 1762-1764 timeframe, was one of the Samuel in good standing (juror and constable) while the other one was being detained for debt?  Or was there only Samuel, Sr. left in Middlesex to account for all of this activity, with Samuel Jr. running away from debt in 1761?

There is not yet enough information to answer any of these questions, but we are now smart enough to at least pose them.

John Bunnell   

__________________________________________________________________________________

Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #1324 (1761):  Watson, Thomas, v. Bonnell, Samuel, Jr. 
Middlesex Common Pleas
Thomas Watson } Cas’e 
V } Debt
Samuel Bonnell Jun } £31.4
Stockton Atty

Ret. To Aprill Term 1761
Non est
Sam’el Throckmorton Shf.

Defend’t lives near Penn’s Neck

Middlesex County.  fs. George the third by the grace of God of Great Britain, France & Ireland King Defender of the Faith &c  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex – Greeting We command you that you take Samuel Bonnell otherwise called Samuel Bonnell Jun. of Winsor in the County of Middlesex & province of New Jersey Blacksmith if he may be found within your Bailwick and him safely keep so that you may have his Body before the Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas at Perth Amboy in & for our s’d County of Middlesex on the third Tuesday in Aprill ~ next to answer unto Thomas Watson of a Plea that he render unto him Thirty one Pounds four Shillings current Money of New Jersey which to him he owes and from him unjustly detains (as is said) And have you then there this Writ  Witness James Hude Esq’r Judge of our s’d Court at Perth Amboy af’d the Twenty first Day of January in the First Year of our Reign ~

Stockton Att’y
Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #1324 (1761):  Watson, Thomas, v. Bonnell, Samuel, Jr. 

Middlesex Common Pleas
Thomas Watson } Cas’e 
V } Debt
Samuel Bonnell Jun } £31.4
Stockton Atty

Ret. To Aprill Term 1761
Non est
Sam’el Throckmorton Shf.

Defend’t lives near Penn’s Neck

Middlesex County.  fs. George the third by the grace of God of Great Britain, France & Ireland King Defender of the Faith &c  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex – Greeting We command you that you take Samuel Bonnell otherwise called Samuel Bonnell Jun. of Winsor in the County of Middlesex & province of New Jersey Blacksmith if he may be found within your Bailwick and him safely keep so that you may have his Body before the Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas at Perth Amboy in & for our s’d County of Middlesex on the third Tuesday in Aprill ~ next to answer unto Thomas Watson of a Plea that he render unto him Thirty one Pounds four Shillings current Money of New Jersey which to him he owes and from him unjustly detains (as is said) And have you then there this Writ  Witness James Hude Esq’r Judge of our s’d Court at Perth Amboy af’d the Twenty first Day of January in the First Year of our Reign ~

Stockton Att’y




_________________________________________________________________________________
Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #1325 (1761):  Watson, Thomas, v. Bonnell, Samuel, Sr. 

Middlesex Common Pleas
Thomas Watson } Cas’e 
V } Debt
Samuel Bonnell Sen } £31.4
Stockton Atty

Ret. To Aprill Term 1761
Cepi Corpus
Sam’el Throckmorton Shf.
Mileage 6/8

Def’t lives near Penn Neck

Middlesex fs. George the third by the grace of God of Great Britain, France & Ireland King Defender of the Faith &c  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex Greeting We command you that you take Samuel Bonnell otherwise called Samuel Bonnell sen of Winsor in the County of Middlesex & Province of New Jersey Blacksmith if he may be found within your Bailwick and him safely keep so that you may have his Body before the Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas at Perth Amboy on the third Tuesday in Aprill next to answer unto Thomas Watson of a Plea that he render unto him Thirty one Pounds four Shillings current lawful Money of New Jersey which to him he owes and from him unjustly detains (as is said) And have you then there this Writ  Witness James Hude Esq’r Judge of our s’d Court at Perth Amboy af’d the Twenty first Day of January in the First Year of our Reign ~
Stockton Att’y Smyth Clk



Middlesex Court Case #2419 (1766): Brown, Richard v. Wright, Jacob

Teammates,

As we move back into 1761, here is another document regarding Jacob Wright.  In this one, the plaintiffs are again the Executors of the Preserve Brown estate.  I think this case is linked to case #2419 from 1766 (Richard Brown, by himself, v. Jacob Wright) that I sent earlier, although I cannot exactly square the monetary amounts.  From this 1761 case, it is interesting that the estate is not looking for a payment of the principal on the debt, just the twenty-five pounds proclamation money.  This must mean that there is a previous case or lost documentation in this case where the proclamation money was calculated.  In the 1766 case, Richard Brown is also trying to recover proclamation money, although the amount is slightly different than in 1761 (now twenty-four pounds, sixteen shillings, four pence) plus new damages.  My best guess is that Richard Brown took the right to further pursue this case as one part of the estate settlement for Preserve Brown and was following up in 1766, once Jacob had enough possessions to make it worth his while.  It looks like it didn't get him much, as the confiscation of all of Jacob Wright's goods and chattels in the county only netted five pounds.  

It may be that the most interesting piece of this document is the statement that "The Deft lives with John Wade or a place/late Jos. Radford."  It will be great if we can link these individuals with a specific location in the county.

I not only included the scan and transcription of the 1761, but an improved transcription of the 1766 case.  Please replace my earlier file with this one.  

John Bunnell


Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #66 (1761):  Brown, Preserve (Estate); Brown, Richard; Brown, William; Jones, John (Executor of Preserve Brown) v. Wright, Jacob
__________________________________________________________________________________
Middlesex Pleas
Case of Pre. Brown } Case dam
V } £25
Jacob Wright }

The Deft lives with John Wade or a place/late Jos. Radford
Cape Corpus
Middlesex }
County } fs. George the Third by the Grace of God of Great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the faith.  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex – Greeting we command you that you take Jacob Wright late of the County Aforesaid if he may be found within your Bailywick and him Safely keep so that you may have his Body before our Judges of our next Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in an for our said County of Middlesex on the third Tuesday in July –next / then and there / to answer Richard Brown, William Brown, and John Jones Executors of the last will and testament of Preserve Brown deceased, of a plea of Trespass out he Case &’a  To thou damage Twenty Four pounds Proclamation Money fastis said and have you then and there this writt.  Witness James Slade – Esq. Judge of your said court at Perth Amboy aforesaid the twenty-first Day of April – in the first year of our Reign

Pidgeon Esq. Smyth Clk






Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #2419 (1766):  Brown, Richard v. Wright, Jacob
__________________________________________________________________________________
Middlesex Pleas
Richard Brown }
V } fi. fa. debt
Jacob Wright }
July 1766
20th day of Feby 1765
Bill How £ 12:8:4
Jut tile
Costs Taxed at £
By virtue of the written writ To me Directed I have Seized and taken Divers goods and Chattels to the value of five Pounds which Remain in my hands unsold for want of Buyers
John Moore Srf.
Middlesex County
George the Third by the Grace of God of great Britain France and Ireland king Defender of the faith.  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex Greeting we Command you that of the Goods & Chattels of Jacob Wright Otherwise called Jacob Wright of Winsor Township In the County of Middlesex farmer, In your bailiwick you Cause to be made as well the Sum of Twenty Four Pounds Sixteen Shillings and four pence Proclamation Money which Richard Brown lately Before our Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas held at Perth Amboy in and for our Said County of Middlesex Recovered Against him of Debt, As Also three pounds eight shillings and three pence ---
Money Aforesaid which to him in our Said Court before our Said Judges were Adjudged for his Damages which he hath Sustained, as well by the Occasion of the Detention of that Same Debt, as for his Costs and Charges by him About his Suit in that behalf Expended ---
Whereof the Said Jacob Wright is convicted, as to us Opinean of Record, and have you those Moneys before our Said Judges of our said Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in and for our said County of Middlesex On the Third Tuesday in July – Next, To render the Aforesaid Richard Brown for his Debt and Damages Afd So as Aforesaid Recovered and have you then & there this writ

Witness James Nelsson Esq. Judge of our Said Court at Perth Amboy Aforesaid in the County Aforesaid the fifteenth Day of April in the Sixth year of our Reign

Pidgeon  Att Smyth  Clk
Middlesex Pleas
Richard Brown } Vend Exp




V } Ca. Sa. ft. Ressidue
Jacob Wright }
October 1766
1765 – 20th Feby Bill
payible with Interest for £ 12:8:4
Interest Tile paid £
Costs £ 3:7:6
Addit. D’o 0:7:6
Non Est
John Moore Sr.

The goods and chattels That Remains In my hands unsold for want of Buyers
John Moore Sr.
County of Middlesex
Fst George the third by the grace of god of Great Britain France and Ireland king Defender of the faith.  To our Sheriff of our County of Middlesex Greeting , Whereas we lately Commanded you that the Goods & Chattels of Jacob Wright otherwise Called Jacob Wright of Windsor Township In the County of Middlesex farmer, You Should Cause to be made as well the Sum of Twenty four Pounds Sixteen Schillings & four pence Proclamation Money Which Richard Brown lately before our Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Please held at Perth Amboy in & for Said County of Middlesex Recovered Against him of Debt and Also Three Pounds Seven Schillings and Six pence --- Money Af’d which to him in our Said Court before our Said Judges Were Adjudged for his Damages which he hath Sustained As well by Occasion of the Detention of that Debt as for his Costs and Charges by him About his Suit in that behalf expended Where the said Jacob Wright was as to us Appear of Record, and that you Should have Those moneys before our Said Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in and for our Said County of Middlesex on the Third Tuesday in July then Next, &now part, to render to the Af’d Richard Brown for his Debt and Damages Af’d, and you that Day Returned to us that by the Virtue of our Writt, To you Directed for that Purpose, you fed Srvyed & taken Divers Goods and Chattels of the Said Jacob Wright To the Value of five Pounds Part of the Debt and Damages Af’d which Goods and Chattels Remain in your hands unsold for want of buyers, So That you Could not have the Moneys before the Day Af’d and that he had not anymore Goods and Chattels in your Bailywick Where you Could Cause to be Levied any more of the moneys Contained in our Writt.  Therefore We Command you that you Expose to Sale the Goods & Chattels Af’d of the Said Jacob Wright Taken by you In Manner Af’d and have you those Moneys before our Judges of our Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in and for our Said County of Middlesex on the second Tuesday in October Next, To Render to the Said Richard Brown for part of his Debt and Damages Af’d And Also we Command you that You take the Said Jacob Wright if he may be found within your Bailywick and him Safely keep so that you may have his Body before our said Judges of our Said Inferior Court of Common Pleas to be held at Perth Amboy in and for our Said County of Middlesex on the Second Tuesday in October Next to Satisfie the Said Richard Brown the Sum of Twenty Three Pounds Three Schillings and Ten Pence ~ Residue of the Said Twenty eight Pounds Three Shillings and Ten pence ~ And have you then and there this writt
Witness James Nelsson Esq’r Judge or our Said Court at Perth Amboy Af’d in the County Af’d the sixteenth Day of July in the Sixth Year of our Reign
Pidgeon  Att Smyth  Clk


June 2-5, 2016: Southern California Genealogical Society Jamboree & DNA Day

One of the best genealogy conferences in the country is run by the all-volunteer Southern California Genealogical Society every June. It's in Burbank (though not in the Beautiful Downtown) and is a blast. Three days (four with the DNA symposium) of programs and communion with fellow pursuers of the past, an exhibit hall with every major record provider and a venue run by downright nice people. What more can one want?

The location is great–the Burbank Marriott and Convention Center, right across the street from the Burbank Airport. Turn right and go to the SCGS library of 40,000+ volumes. Turn left and dead end at Warner Brothers Studio. There's even a tour of Hollywood Forever Cemetery!



"Windsor" in 18th Century Middlesex County Court Records-Where is It?

The location references in the numerous documents from the NJ Archives that John B. obtained don't seen to be consistent in their references to Samuel Bonnells location - yet I think they may all be referring to the same place.   Samuel Bonnell of Windsor seems to have meant the same thing as Samuel Bonnell of Windsor Township and Samuell Bonnell of New Windsor Township.  The whole area was New Windsor Township until 1750 when it became just Windsor Township - but, apparently, it was just generally referred to as Windsor by the locals. Also, the terms Township and Town were often used interchangeably for the same entity in those days - as in the document listing "Town Officers for Windsor for 1762." 

 I point this out to avoid possible confusion of that more general location with the current town of Windsor in Robbinsville Township of Mercer County.  That town wasn't founded until 1818 and was not called Windsor until 1846.  So that could not have been the Windsor referenced in these documents from the 1700s. The current Robbinsville , East Windsor, West Windsor, and Princeton Townships were all part of the original New Windsor Township.  So far, the only location reference in the documents that has been more specific is the early reference to Penn's Neck which is the area across Stony Brook from Princeton University located between Stony Brook and the Millstone River.  

I keep looking for any clues in the documents that would help pin down where one or both of the Samuel Bonnells actually lived within Windsor/New Windsor Township. It's likely that they lived in more than one place over the more than 30 years covered by the documents but, so far, Penn's Neck is the only location that is very specific.  I look forward to seeing more of the documents as John works his way through them.

George Farris

Middlesex Court Miscellaneous Documents #257 (1762):

Teammates,

Here is a short one.  Although we saw in the last document that one of the Samuel Bonnells was undergoing a collection action in 1762, either that one or another of them was, that same year, being appointed as a Constable for the town of Windsor.

John Bunnell

Windsor Officers
1762
_______________________________________________________________________________
Town Officers for Windssor for 1762
Clerk }
& } Joseph Shelton
Recorder }
Freholders} Albert Schenck
} James Olden
Comm’r }         John Tindall 
for } John Chamber Cain
Roads }
Assesor Joseph Shelton

Collection William Updick

Overseers } Richard Major
Roar } Joseph Olden

Overss’r } Abraham Bucalew, Jacob Schenck
Roads Peter Grom Jr., Benj’n Atchley
John Clarke


Constables Samuel Bunnell & Rich’d Kerry Jr. 








Middlesex Court Case #673 (1749-1763) Kearny v. Bonnell

Here is the next installment of the NJ State Archives documents.  This is for another indebtedness case for Samuel Bonnell, although it is unclear whether it is for the senior or junior.  This case started in 1749, so it appears the 1762-1763 action was an attempt by the plaintiff to recover funds beyond that which he recovered in 1749.  It doesn't look like this came to much, as the Sheriff's note indicates they recovered only an additional five pounds the second time around.  At over ninety pounds, this was a much bigger debt than we've seen in the other cases, so maybe this was the most significant cause of the trouble.

John Bunnell  

Transcription of Middlesex Court Case #673 (1749, 1763):  Kearny, Philip v. Bonnell, Samuel
__________________________________________________________________________________
Mid’x Pleas

Philip Kearny } Ca Sa 
v } in Debt
Samuel Bonnell }

Ret to April Term 1749

Prin:  Debt July £49:9:6
With Inter from 18th }
April 1748 Icutite paid }
Costs & pro £2.4.8 }
Debt Inter & Cost £2:12:1

Non Est Invertus Hi
John Deard Sheriff

New Jersey }
Middlesex } fs: George the second by the grace of God of great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith.  To the Sheriff of our County of Middlesex ~ Greeting We Command you Samuel Bonnell yeoman otherwise called Samuel Bonnell of New Windsor in the County of Middlesex and Province of New Jersey yeoman if he Shall be found within your Bailiwick and him Safely keep so that you have his body before the Judges of our County Court for holding of pleas at Perth Amoy in & for our s’d County on the Third Tuesday in April next To Satisfie Philip Kearny as well of a Certain Debt on Ninety Pounds nineteen Shillings Current Money of New Jersey at Eight Shillings the ounce which the s’d Philip in our s’d Court before our s’d Judges at Pert Amboy afores’d in our County afores’d against him recovered as also of the Sum of two pounds four Shillings and Eight Pence proclamation money which the said Philip Kearny in our s’d Court were adjudged for his Damages which he hath Sustained by Occasion of the Detention of that Debt whereof he is Convicted, and have you then & there this writ ~
Witness Robert Hude Esq’r Judge of our s’d Court at Perth Amboy afores’d in our County af’d the Eighteenth Day of January in the Twenty second year of our Reign
P Kearny Skinner D Clk









Middlesex Pleas
Philip Kearny } fi fa 
v } in Debt
Samuel Bonnell } post Sei fa

Returned to January Term 1763
Principal Debt Jersey £45:9:6
W’th Interest from 18th of }
April 1748 until paid }
orrig’l costs proc: £2:4:8 }
costs since and of } }
Sci fat hereof } £3:8:3 }
6:2:11 }
Debt Interest & Costs 7:3:4
Jersey

New Jersey
Middlesex } fs. George the third by the Grace of God of Great Britain France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith &c  To the Sheriff of our County of Middlesex  Greeting we Command you that of the Goods and Chattles of Samuel Bonnel yeoman Otherwise Called Samuel Bonnel of new windsor in the County of Middlesex and Province of New Jersey yeoman in our Bailywick you Cause to be made as well a Certain Debt of ninety pounds nineteen Shillings Current money of new Jersey at Eight Shillings the ounce which Philip Kearny in our County Court for holding of pleas befreo the Judges of our said Court at Perth Amboy in our said County aforesaid recovered against him as also of the sum of two pounds four shillings and Eight pence proclamation money which to the said Phillip in our said Court it is considered that the said Philip may have Execution against the said Samuel for the Debt and damages aforesaid by the Default of the said Samuel and have you that money before the Judges of our said Court at Perth Amboy aforesaid in our County aforesaid on the third Tuesday in January next to render unot the said Philip for his Debt and damages aforesaid and have you then and there this writ  Witness James Thompson Esq’r Judge of our said Court at Perth Amboy aforesaid in our County aforesaid the thirteenth day of October in the second year of our Reign
P’ Kearny Attorney Smyth Clk
_________________________________________________________________________________

By virtue of the within writ to me Directed I Cause to be taken Divers Goods and Chattles of the within named Samuel Bonnell to the Value of five Pounds in part of the Debt within mentioned which receiving my hands wa sold for cash of Breyer and which asa ale the Goods & Chattels of the said Samuel Bonnell to be found within my Bailywick &c